Mark 5 : 26

Greek and Latin open with the connective καί / et; the Peshitta instead employs a relative pronoun ܐܝܕܐ ('she who') at token 0, recasting the entire clause as a relative description of the woman rather than a coordinate narrative continuation.

The Syriac feminine relative pronoun ܐܝܕܐ has no direct equivalent in the Greek or Latin, which carry the subject implicitly through the feminine participles; the Peshitta makes the antecedent grammatically explicit.

Greek παθοῦσα and Syriac ܣܒܠܬ are simple aorist/perfect verbal forms of 'suffer'; the Vulgate expands into the periphrastic pluperfect fuerat … perpessa ('had suffered'), a Latin stylistic preference for compound past tenses in narrative background.

Greek and Latin place 'many/compluribus' before the noun 'physicians', whereas the Peshitta places ܣܓܝܐܐ after ܐܣܘܬܐ, reflecting the normal Syriac adjective-follows-noun order without affecting meaning.

The Clementine Vulgate inserts a colon dividing the clause; this editorial punctuation has no counterpart in the unpointed Greek or Syriac textual stream.

Greek δαπανήσασα and Latin erogaverat denote 'having spent/expended', while the Syriac ܘܐܦܩܬ (root a-p-q, 'to bring/lay out') is fused with the preceding conjunction in a single token and renders the sense 'she paid out', a lexically distinct but semantically equivalent verb of expenditure.

Greek substantivises the possessive with article + prepositional phrase (τὰ παρ᾽ αὐτῆς πάντα, 'all the things from herself'); the Peshitta uses a relative possessive construction ܟܠ ܡܕܡ ܕܐܝܬ ܠܗ ('everything that was hers'); the Vulgate compresses both to omnia sua ('all her own'). All three convey total expenditure of her means.

Greek continues with coordinating καί and the Syriac with ܘ- prefixed to ܡܕܡ; the Vulgate drops the connective entirely, using nec to fold the conjunction and negation together in the following clause.

The Peshitta adds the emphatic particle ܐܦ ('even/also') before 'more', intensifying the contrast; neither the Greek nor the Latin carries a corresponding adverbial particle here.

Greek uses an idiomatic motion construction εἰς τὸ χεῖρον ἐλθοῦσα ('having come into the worse'); the Vulgate renders it more plainly deterius habebat ('she was worse off'); the Syriac collapses the whole phrase into a single passive verb ܐܬܐܠܨܬ (root a-l-ts, 'she was distressed/oppressed'), an idiomatic rendering of worsening condition.

The closing colon of the Vulgate is an editorial division mark added by the Clementine editors and has no basis in the Greek or Syriac textual tradition.