Mark 9 : 7

Greek uses καὶ ἐγένετο (conjunction + aorist verb); Peshitta employs the single verb ܘܗܘܬ (waw-consecutive perfect); Vulgate expands to Et facta est (conjunction + perfect passive participle + copula), a periphrastic construction typical of Latin narrative style.

Greek uses a present participle ἐπισκιάζουσα with dative pronoun αὐτοῖς; Vulgate mirrors this with obumbrans eos (participle + accusative); Peshitta employs a finite verb construction ܘܡܛܠܐ ܗܘܬ ܥܠܝܗܘܢ (waw + participle + verb + prepositional phrase), reflecting Syriac preference for finite verbal forms over Greek-style participial constructions.

Greek repeats καὶ ἐγένετο; Peshitta uses simple waw-conjunction with the noun ܘܩܠܐ (eliding the verb); Vulgate employs et venit (conjunction + perfect active verb), substituting 'came' for 'was/became' to vary the narrative diction.

Greek uses demonstrative pronoun οὗτός with copula ἐστιν; Vulgate mirrors with Hic est; Peshitta employs the demonstrative ܗܢܘ alone, eliding the copula as is typical in Syriac nominal sentences.

Greek ὁ ἀγαπητός (the beloved) uses the standard NT term; Vulgate carissimus (most dear) employs a superlative form; Peshitta ܚܒܝܒܐ (beloved) uses the simple adjective, semantically equivalent to Greek but without the article.

Peshitta adds the prepositional phrase ܠܗ ('to him' / 'for him'), likely an explanatory gloss clarifying the dative relationship implicit in Greek μου or serving as an ethical dative emphasizing the Father's affection. Neither Greek nor Vulgate attest this element.