Mark 1:26 — 希腊文 / 别西大 / 武加大对齐

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

construction All three attest

Greek NT καὶ

Peshitta ܘܫܕܬܗ

Vulgate Et

Greek and Latin coordinate with καί / Et plus a participle (σπαράξαν / discerpens), whereas the Peshitta fuses the conjunction, verb, and object pronoun into a single finite form ܘܫܕܬܗ ('and-it-threw-him'); the divergence is morphosyntactic rather than semantic.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

construction All three attest

Greek NT σπαράξαν αὐτὸν

Peshitta ܘܫܕܬܗ

Vulgate discerpens eum

Greek uses an aorist participle plus accusative object (σπαράξαν αὐτόν), matched by the Latin present participle plus pronoun (discerpens eum); the Peshitta encodes the same idea synthetically with the object suffix on ܘܫܕܬܗ, hence the same indices recur for the Syriac side.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

construction All three attest

Greek NT τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἀκάθαρτον

Peshitta ܪܘܚܐ ܛܢܦܬܐ

Vulgate spiritus immundus

Greek employs the articular construction τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἀκάθαρτον with a repeated article framing the attributive adjective, an emphatic Markan idiom; the Vulgate (spiritus immundus) and Peshitta (ܪܘܚܐ ܛܢܦܬܐ) render the phrase anarthrously per their normal usage, lacking the doubled article.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

construction All three attest

Greek NT καὶ

Peshitta ܘܩܥܬ

Vulgate et

The coordinating καί / et introduces the second participle in Greek and Latin; the Peshitta again fuses the conjunction into the finite verb ܘܩܥܬ, so the single Syriac token covers both the connective and the verbal action of the next group.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

construction All three attest

Greek NT ἐξ αὐτοῦ

Peshitta ܡܢܗ

Vulgate ab eo

Greek and Latin express separation with a preposition plus genitive/ablative pronoun (ἐξ αὐτοῦ / ab eo); the Peshitta uses the synthetic prepositional pronoun ܡܢܗ ('from-him'), collapsing preposition and object into one token.

Mark 1 : 26

批判性批注