Greek ἐκεῖνοι ('those') and Syriac ܗܢܘܢ ('they/those') both supply an explicit demonstrative subject; the Vulgate omits any demonstrative, supplying only the noun Coloni, so the deictic emphasis present in Greek and Syriac is lost in the Latin.
EN But those farmers said among themselves, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.’
ES Mas aquellos labradores dijeron entre sí: Este es el heredero; venid, matémosle, y la heredad será nuestra.
ZH-HANS 不料,那些园户彼此说:『这是承受产业的。来吧,我们杀他,产业就归我们了!』
ZH-HANT 不料,那些園戶彼此說:『這是承受產業的。來吧,我們殺他,產業就歸我們了!』
Greek ἐκεῖνοι ('those') and Syriac ܗܢܘܢ ('they/those') both supply an explicit demonstrative subject; the Vulgate omits any demonstrative, supplying only the noun Coloni, so the deictic emphasis present in Greek and Syriac is lost in the Latin.
Greek uses the articular plural οἱ γεωργοί ('the farmers/vinedressers'); Syriac ܦܠܚܐ (from p-l-kh, 'to labour/till') and Latin Coloni ('tenant-farmers') render the same agricultural agent without the Greek article, a routine omission since neither Syriac nor Latin possesses a definite article of this type.
The reflexive phrase 'to themselves' is rendered analytically in Greek (πρὸς ἑαυτούς) and Latin (ad invicem, a reciprocal 'to one another'), but synthetically in Syriac by the single prepositional form ܒܢܦܫܗܘܢ ('within/among themselves', lit. 'in their souls', from n-p-sh); the Latin invicem additionally shifts the nuance from purely reflexive to reciprocal.
Greek introduces direct discourse with recitative ὅτι, a Hebraising/Septuagintal marker functionally equivalent to opening quotation marks; both Syriac and Latin (the latter using a colon) render the speech directly without an introductory conjunction.
Greek and Latin express the predicate nominative analytically with explicit copula and article (οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ κληρονόμος / Hic est hæres); Syriac contracts the demonstrative and copula into the enclitic ܗܢܘ ('this-is') followed by ܝܪܬܐ (y-r-th, 'heir'), a characteristic Syriac economy of the nominal clause.
Greek and Latin express the hortatory subjunctive plus separate accusative pronoun (ἀποκτείνωμεν αὐτόν / occidamus eum); Syriac fuses verb and object suffix into the single form ܢܩܛܠܝܘܗܝ ('let us kill him'), the normal Semitic synthetic construction with pronominal object suffix.
The coordinating conjunction καί / et is attested in Greek and Latin; in Syriac the connective is carried prefixally by the waw of ܘܬܗܘܐ ('and it will be'), so no separate conjunction token appears, though the syntactic coordination is fully preserved.
Greek fronts the genitive ἡμῶν ('ours') for emphasis before the verb, matched by Latin nostra; Syriac uses the independent possessive ܕܝܠܢ ('ours'), placed after the verb, reflecting differing default word-order conventions while preserving the emphatic possessive sense.
Greek marks the subject with article ἡ κληρονομία; Syriac ܝܪܬܘܬܐ (y-r-th) and Latin hæreditas render 'the inheritance' anarthrously, the article being unavailable/unneeded, with all three sharing the same inheritance root concept (cf. ܝܪܬܐ in this verse).