Mark 5:41 — 希腊文 / 别西大 / 武加大对齐

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

construction All three attest

Greek NT κρατήσας τῆς χειρὸς τοῦ παιδίου

Peshitta ܒܐܝܕܗ ܕܛܠܝܬܐ

Vulgate tenens manum puellæ

Greek employs an aorist participle with genitive article construction (κρατήσας τῆς χειρὸς τοῦ παιδίου); Vulgate uses a present participle with accusative direct object (tenens manum puellæ); Peshitta uses a prepositional phrase with pronominal suffix (ܒܐܝܕܗ ܕܛܠܝܬܐ, 'by-her-hand of-the-girl'). All three convey identical semantics through language-specific syntactic patterns.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

punctuation All three attest

Greek NT λέγει αὐτῇ·

Peshitta ܘܐܡܪ ܠܗ

Vulgate ait illi Talitha

Vulgate inserts a colon after illi to mark the transition to direct speech, a feature absent in Greek and Peshitta manuscripts. The semantic content (λέγει αὐτῇ / ܘܐܡܪ ܠܗ / ait illi) remains identical across all three traditions.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

omission Two witnesses

Greek NT ὅ ἐστιν μεθερμηνευόμενον

Vulgate est interpretatum Puella (tibi

The Peshitta omits the entire translation formula (ὅ ἐστιν μεθερμηνευόμενον / quod est interpretatum), proceeding directly from the Aramaic phrase to its Syriac rendering. This omission is natural since Syriac readers would understand ܛܠܝܬܐ ܩܘܡܝ without requiring a metalinguistic gloss, whereas Greek and Latin audiences needed the explanatory clause.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

expansion Two witnesses

Greek NT τὸ κοράσιον σοὶ λέγω

Vulgate dico) surge

Greek and Vulgate expand the translation with a vocative address and emphatic dative construction (τὸ κοράσιον, σοὶ λέγω / Puella, tibi dico, 'Girl, to you I say'), making explicit what is implicit in the Aramaic imperative. The Peshitta, already rendering the command in Syriac, treats ܛܠܝܬܐ ܩܘܡܝ as self-sufficient and omits the redundant explanatory expansion present in the Greek translation apparatus.

Mark 5 : 41

批判性批注