Mark 3 : 25

Greek ἐὰν and Latin si both introduce a conditional protasis, but the Peshitta ܘܐܢ combines the conjunction ܘ ('and') with the conditional particle ܐܢ, reflecting typical Semitic paratactic style where coordinating and subordinating functions merge.

Greek ἐφ᾽ ἑαυτήν ('against itself') uses the preposition ἐπί with accusative reflexive; Latin super semetipsam employs super with an intensified reflexive pronoun; Syriac ܥܠ ܢܦܫܗ uses ܥܠ ('upon/against') with ܢܦܫܗ ('its soul/self'), a standard Semitic reflexive idiom—all semantically equivalent but lexically distinct.

Greek μερισθῇ (aorist passive subjunctive of μερίζω, 'to divide') and Latin dispertiatur (present passive subjunctive of dispertior) both denote division; Syriac ܢܬܦܠܓ (ethpeal of ܦܠܓ) is cognate with Hebrew פלג and conveys the same semantic range, though the Syriac employs the reflexive-passive stem typical of Northwest Semitic.

Greek δυνήσεται (future middle indicative of δύναμαι, 'will be able') contrasts with Latin potest (present indicative of possum, 'is able') and Syriac ܡܫܟܚ (participle of ܫܟܚ, 'able/finding'), reflecting different aspectual choices: Greek future, Latin gnomic present, Syriac participial construction—functionally equivalent in this modal context.