Mark 3 : 35

Greek expresses the indefinite condition with the modal particle ἂν plus aorist subjunctive ποιήσῃ; Syriac uses an imperfect/subjunctive ܕܢܥܒܕ without a separate particle, while Latin renders it with the future perfect fecerit. All three convey the indefinite future ('whoever shall do'), but each language deploys a distinct morphological strategy.

Greek articulates the object as τὸ θέλημα with a separate genitive following; Syriac compresses it into the construct/suffixed form ܨܒܝܢܗ ('his will') anticipating the following genitive, a typical Semitic anticipatory pronominal construction. Latin voluntatem agrees with the Greek analytic pattern.

Greek and Latin use a demonstrative subject (οὗτος / hic, 'this one'); Syriac uses the emphatic pronominal copula ܗܘܝܘ ('he it is'), which simultaneously functions as demonstrative and verb 'to be', thereby also absorbing the function of Greek ἐστίν.

Greek ἀδελφός μου and Latin frater meus use a noun plus possessive; Syriac ܐܚܝ encodes the first-person possessive suffix within the single word ('my brother'), an inflectional rather than analytic possession.

Greek ἀδελφή μου and Latin soror mea express 'my sister' analytically; Syriac ܘܚܬܝ fuses the conjunction, noun, and first-person suffix into one form. The conjunction and the noun share the single Syriac token here.

Greek μήτηρ and Latin mater stand without a possessive in the absolute; Syriac ܘܐܡܝ again fuses conjunction plus the suffixed 'my mother', so the possessive on 'mother' is explicit in Syriac but only implied in Greek and Latin.

Greek closes with the finite copula ἐστίν and Latin with est; the Syriac has no separate copula here because its function was already discharged by ܗܘܝܘ earlier in the verse, a normal feature of Syriac nominal-clause syntax.