Polyglot Concordance / Mk · Teaching on the Way to Jerusalem
New Testament · Teaching on the Way to Jerusalem · Mark

Mark 10 : 32

EN They were on the way, going up to Jerusalem; and Jesus was going in front of them, and they were amazed; and those who followed were afraid. He again took the twelve, and began to tell them the things that were going to happen to him.

ES Y estaban en el camino subiendo á Jerusalem; y Jesús iba delante de ellos, y se espantaban, y le seguían con miedo: entonces volviendo á tomar á los doce aparte, les comenzó á decir las cosas que le habían de acontecer:

ZH-HANS 他们行路上耶路撒冷去。耶稣在前头走,门徒就希奇,跟从的人也害怕。耶稣又叫过十二个门徒来,把自己将要遭遇的事告诉他们说:

ZH-HANT 他們行路上耶路撒冷去。耶穌在前頭走,門徒就希奇,跟從的人也害怕。耶穌又叫過十二個門徒來,把自己將要遭遇的事告訴他們說:

Mark 10:31
Mark :
Mark 10:33

Critical apparatus

15 variants · 3 witnesses
𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT Ἦσαν
Peshitta ܣܠܩܝܢ ܗܘܘ
Vulgate Erant

Greek opens with the imperfect Ἦσαν ('they were') governing the participle ἀναβαίνοντες in a periphrastic construction; the Peshitta inverts the sequence, fronting the participle ܣܠܩܝܢ with the auxiliary ܗܘܘ following, and prefaces the whole with the temporal subordinator ܟܕ ('while'). Latin Erant matches the Greek finite verb directly.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
grammar All three attest
Greek NT ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ
Peshitta ܒܐܘܪܚܐ
Vulgate in via

Greek ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ and Latin in via render the prepositional phrase analytically with the definite article; Syriac ܒܐܘܪܚܐ fuses preposition, noun, and inherent determination into a single inflected form, the emphatic state supplying the definiteness expressed by the Greek article.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ἀναβαίνοντες
Peshitta ܣܠܩܝܢ ܗܘܘ
Vulgate ascendentes

The Greek present participle ἀναβαίνοντες and Latin ascendentes function as predicate participles within the periphrastic 'they were going up'; the Syriac realises the same idea through the participle ܣܠܩܝܢ plus auxiliary ܗܘܘ already counted at the verse opening, so the alignment reflects shared lexical content with divergent clausal placement.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT εἰς Ἱεροσόλυμα (Hi'erosoluma)
Peshitta ܠܐܘܪܫܠܡ
Vulgate Jerosolymam

Greek uses εἰς + accusative Ἱεροσόλυμα ('to Jerusalem') and Latin the bare allative accusative Jerosolymam; Syriac ܠܐܘܪܫܠܡ prefixes the directional ܠ to the toponym, a single token absorbing the preposition. The parenthetical transliteration in the Greek input is editorial and carries no textual weight.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT καὶ
Peshitta ܗܘܐ
Vulgate illos

Greek ἦν προάγων is overtly periphrastic (imperfect of εἰμί + present participle); Latin collapses this into the single imperfect præcedebat, while Syriac employs ܩܕܝܡ ܗܘܐ, again periphrastic with the verb 'to be'. All express durative leading-on-before, differing only in analytic versus synthetic encoding.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT αὐτοὺς ὁ
Peshitta ܗܘ ܝܫܘܥ
Vulgate et

Greek marks the subject with article + name (ὁ Ἰησοῦς) placed after the participle; Syriac fronts the independent pronoun ܗܘ before ܝܫܘܥ as an emphatic resumptive ('he, Jesus'); Latin gives the bare Jesus. The differences are stylistic markers of subject prominence, not semantic divergences.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT καὶ
Peshitta ܘܡܬܬܡܗܝܢ ܗܘܘ
Vulgate et

Greek ἐθαμβοῦντο and Latin stupebant are simple imperfect passives ('they were amazed'); Syriac renders this with the participle ܘܡܬܬܡܗܝܢ plus auxiliary ܗܘܘ, an Ethpaal periphrasis conveying the same durative astonishment by analytic means.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ἐθαμβοῦντο· οἱ δὲ
Peshitta ܘܐܙܠܝܢ ܗܘܘ ܒܬܪܗ
Vulgate timebant Et

Greek substantivises the participle with article and connective δέ (οἱ δὲ ἀκολουθοῦντες, 'and those following'); Latin gives the bare participle et sequentes; Syriac recasts the clause finitely as ܘܐܙܠܝܢ ܗܘܘ ܒܬܪܗ ('and they were going after him'), supplying an explicit verb of motion plus pronominal object where the Greek and Latin use a single participial substantive.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ἀκολουθοῦντες
Peshitta ܟܕ ܕܚܝܠܝܢ
Vulgate assumens

Greek ἐφοβοῦντο and Latin timebant stand as a finite imperfect of fear; the Peshitta subordinates the same notion with ܟܕ ܕܚܝܠܝܢ ('while [they were] afraid'), turning the third coordinate clause into a temporal-circumstantial participial phrase headed by ܟܕ. The Greek paragraph marker ¶ is editorial.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ἐφοβοῦντο.¶
Peshitta ܘܕܒܪ
Vulgate iterum

Greek and Latin open the new sentence with the coordinating conjunction Καὶ / Et governing a following aorist participle; Syriac fuses conjunction and verb into ܘܕܒܪ ('and he took'), expressing as a finite verb what the Greek παραλαβών renders participially.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT Καὶ
Peshitta ܘܕܒܪ
Vulgate duodecim

Greek aorist participle παραλαβών and Latin present participle assumens express the circumstantial 'having taken/taking'; Syriac ܘܕܒܪ (already counted with the conjunction) is a finite perfect, reflecting the Syriac preference for paratactic finite verbs over Greek participial subordination.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
omission Two witnesses
Greek NT παραλαβὼν
Vulgate cœpit

Greek πάλιν ('again') and Latin iterum explicitly mark the repetition of the passion prediction; the Peshitta has no corresponding adverb, omitting the connection to the earlier predictions (cf. Mark 8:31; 9:31). This is a characteristic Syriac economising of redundant Greek particles.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT πάλιν τοὺς
Peshitta ܠܬܪܥܣܪܬܗ
Vulgate illis

Greek τοὺς δώδεκα and Latin duodecim render 'the Twelve' analytically with a determiner; Syriac ܠܬܪܥܣܪܬܗ fuses the directional/object marker ܠ, the numeral, and a third-person pronominal suffix ('his twelve'), the suffix adding a possessive nuance absent from the Greek and Latin.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT αὐτοῖς
Peshitta ܕܢܐܡܪ
Vulgate essent

Greek λέγειν and Latin dicere are bare complementary infinitives after the verb of beginning; Syriac ܕܢܐܡܪ employs an imperfect prefixed with the subordinator ܕ, the standard Syriac substitute for the Greek infinitive in complement position.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT λέγειν τὰ μέλλοντα αὐτῷ
Peshitta ܡܕܡ ܕܥܬܝܕ ܕܢܗܘܐ ܠܗ
Vulgate ei eventura

Greek substantivises with article + participle (τὰ μέλλοντα αὐτῷ συμβαίνειν, 'the things about to happen to him'); Latin uses a relative clause with subjunctive (quæ essent ei eventura); Syriac employs an indefinite head ܡܕܡ ('something/that which') followed by the relative ܕܥܬܝܕ ܕܢܗܘܐ ܠܗ ('which was destined to be to him'), a double-headed relative construction. All three convey the impending passion identically by syntactically distinct means.