Mark 12 : 6

Greek οὖν and Latin ergo both function as inferential conjunctions ('therefore'), while Peshitta ܕܝܢ is a weaker adversative/transitional particle ('but, now'), reflecting typical Syriac narrative style rather than strict logical inference.

Greek uses finite verb εἶχεν with accusative object construction ('he had one beloved son of him'); Latin employs a participial construction habens filium carissimum ('having a most beloved son'); Peshitta uses the existential particle ܐܝܬ ܗܘܐ ܠܗ ('there was to him') with pronominal suffix, a characteristic Semitic possessive idiom.

Greek places the adverbial modifier ἔσχατον ('last') after the object pronoun αὐτόν in post-verbal position; Vulgate mirrors this with novissimum following illum; Peshitta integrates the temporal adverb ܐܚܪܝܬ ('finally, lastly') immediately after the verb ܘܫܕܪܗ, reflecting VSO word order typical of Semitic syntax.

Greek uses participial λέγων with recitative ὅτι; Latin employs gerund dicens with colon punctuation and causal Quia; Peshitta expands with finite verb ܐܡܪ ('he said') plus emphatic particle ܓܝܪ ('for indeed') and adverb ܟܒܪ ('perhaps, surely'), intensifying the speaker's expectation in the direct discourse that follows.

Greek ἐντραπήσονται τὸν υἱόν μου uses future passive deponent with accusative object ('they will respect my son'); Latin reverebuntur filium meum employs future active deponent with accusative; Peshitta ܢܒܗܬܘܢ ܡܢ ܒܪܝ uses imperfect with preposition ܡܢ ('they will be ashamed from/before my son'), where the prepositional construction conveys reverential fear rather than direct object syntax.