Mark 5 : 14

Greek employs a double conjunction καὶ ... δὲ ('and ... but/now') with article οἱ to mark subject shift; Peshitta uses simple ܘܗܢܘܢ ('and those'); Vulgate uses Qui autem ('who however'), a relative pronoun construction. All three mark the same narrative transition but with different syntactic strategies.

Greek uses a present participle βόσκοντες with accusative object αὐτοὺς χοίρους ('feeding them, [the] pigs'); Peshitta employs a periphrastic construction ܕܪܥܝܢ ܗܘܘ ܠܗܘܢ ('who were pasturing to-them') with auxiliary verb; Vulgate uses imperfect pascebant eos ('were feeding them'). The Peshitta and Vulgate omit explicit mention of 'pigs,' relying on context from the preceding verse.

Greek ἀπήγγειλαν (from ἀπαγγέλλω, 'proclaimed, announced') emphasizes formal reporting; Peshitta ܘܐܡܪܘ ('and they said/told') is a simpler, more colloquial verb; Vulgate nuntiaverunt ('they announced') aligns semantically with the Greek but uses a different Latin root. All convey the same action with varying registers of formality.

Greek uses the preposition εἰς with accusative article τὴν πόλιν ('into the city'); Peshitta uses the preposition ܒ ('in/at') with ܡܕܝܢܬܐ, indicating location rather than motion-toward; Vulgate in civitatem mirrors the Greek accusative of motion. The Peshitta's locative construction is idiomatic Syriac, semantically equivalent despite the grammatical difference.

Greek τοὺς ἀγρούς ('the fields/countryside') is plural; Peshitta ܒܩܘܪܝܐ ('in the villages') substitutes a related but distinct term, specifying rural settlements rather than open fields; Vulgate agros ('fields') mirrors the Greek plural. The Peshitta's choice reflects a semantic shift from agricultural land to inhabited rural areas, though both convey 'the countryside' broadly.

Greek καὶ ἦλθον ('and they came') uses aorist indicative; Peshitta ܘܢܦܩܘ ('and they went out') employs a different verb root emphasizing departure/exit; Vulgate Et egressi sunt ('and having gone out') uses a perfect passive participle with auxiliary, creating a compound past construction. The Vulgate's periphrastic perfect is stylistically distinct from the Greek aorist.

Greek uses infinitive ἰδεῖν ('to see') with indirect question τί ἐστιν τὸ γεγονός ('what is the thing having happened'); Peshitta employs infinitive ܠܡܚܙܐ ('to see') with indefinite ܡܕܡ ܕܗܘܐ ('something that happened'), a more compact construction; Vulgate videre quid esset factum ('to see what had been done') uses subjunctive esset in indirect question. The Peshitta's ܡܕܡ ('something') is semantically broader than Greek τί ('what'), and the Vulgate's pluperfect subjunctive factum esset differs aspectually from the Greek perfect participle.