Mark 4:7 — 希腊文 / 别西大 / 武加大对齐

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

construction All three attest

Greek NT εἰς τὰς ἀκάνθας

Peshitta ܒܝܬ ܟܘܒܐ

Vulgate in spinas

Greek uses the preposition εἰς with the accusative article and noun (εἰς τὰς ἀκάνθας); Latin mirrors this with in + accusative (in spinas); Syriac employs the compound preposition ܒܝܬ (beth, 'among/between') without an article, reflecting typical Semitic prepositional usage where the definiteness is contextually implied.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

punctuation Two witnesses

Greek NT καὶ

Vulgate et ascenderunt

The Vulgate inserts a colon after 'spinas' to mark a stronger pause before the consequence clause, creating a two-part structure absent in the Greek and Peshitta. This reflects Latin rhetorical convention rather than a textual variant in the underlying tradition.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

grammar All three attest

Greek NT ἀνέβησαν αἱ ἄκανθαι

Peshitta ܘܣܠܩܘ ܟܘܒܐ

Vulgate spinæ et

Greek employs the definite article with the subject noun (αἱ ἄκανθαι, 'the thorns') in nominative plural; Latin uses the bare noun 'spinæ' in the ablative absolute construction; Syriac uses ܟܘܒܐ without an article, as Syriac typically marks definiteness through context and the emphatic state rather than a separate article, resulting in functional equivalence despite morphological divergence.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul

construction All three attest

Greek NT καρπὸν οὐκ ἔδωκεν

Peshitta ܘܦܐܪܐ ܠܐ ܝܗܒ

Vulgate non dedit

Greek places the negative particle before the verb (καρπὸν οὐκ ἔδωκεν, 'fruit not it-gave'); Latin follows the same order (fructum non dedit); Syriac prefixes the conjunction to 'fruit' (ܘܦܐܪܐ ܠܐ ܝܗܒ, 'and-fruit not it-gave'), reflecting the Syriac preference for attaching conjunctions directly to the following word, but the semantic content and negation placement remain equivalent across all three traditions.

Mark 4 : 7

批判性批注