Mark 5 : 3

Greek and Latin employ a nominal-object idiom 'had (his) dwelling' (τὴν κατοίκησιν εἶχεν / domicilium habebat), while the Peshitta uses a simple verbal periphrasis ܘܥܡܪ ܗܘܐ ('and he was dwelling') with the auxiliary ܗܘܐ to express durative past; the sense is equivalent but the Syriac is verbal rather than nominal.

Greek τοῖς μνήμασιν and Latin in monumentis use the plural 'tombs'; the Peshitta renders ܒܝܬ ܩܒܘܪܐ ('in the house of burial / the tomb-place'), a Syriac compound idiom for the burial precinct treated as a single locale, and drops the explicit preposition since it is fused into the construct phrase.

Greek καί and Latin et coordinate the following clause; the Peshitta has folded the connective into the prefixed waw of ܘܥܡܪ at the verse opening and into ܘܒܫܫܠܬܐ, so no separate conjunction token answers here.

The emphatic negative οὐδέ ('not even') is matched by Latin neque, but the Peshitta expresses the negation solely through ܠܐ later in the clause and offers no separate intensifying particle, slightly flattening the rhetorical force.

Greek οὐκέτι and Latin jam ('no longer') express that prior bindings had failed; the Peshitta lacks any temporal-adverbial equivalent, narrating only the present incapacity to bind him and omitting the iterative nuance.

Greek ἐδύνατο and Latin poterat are single imperfect verbs of ability; the Peshitta uses the negated participle ܠܐ ܡܫܟܚ with the auxiliary ܗܘܐ ('was not finding/able'), where the root š-k-ḥ ('to find') idiomatically carries the sense 'to be able' in Syriac.

Greek αὐτὸν δῆσαι and Latin eum ligare use an explicit accusative pronoun plus infinitive; the Peshitta compresses both into the single infinitive ܠܡܐܣܪܗ ('to bind him') with the object suffixed pronominally, a more economical Syriac construction.

The Clementine Vulgate closes the verse with a colon, signalling continuation into the following clause; neither the Greek (which ends with a period after μνήμασιν mid-verse) nor the Peshitta carries a corresponding terminal mark here.