Polyglot Concordance / Mk · Plot and Anointing
New Testament · Plot and Anointing · Mark

Mark 14 : 11

EN They, when they heard it, were glad, and promised to give him money. He sought how he might conveniently deliver him.

ES Y ellos oyéndolo se holgaron, y prometieron que le darían dineros. Y buscaba oportunidad cómo le entregaría.

ZH-HANS 他们听见就欢喜,又应许给他银子;他就寻思如何得便把耶稣交给他们。

ZH-HANT 他們聽見就歡喜,又應許給他銀子;他就尋思如何得便把耶穌交給他們。

Mark 14:10
Mark :
Mark 14:12

批判性批註

8 處異文 · 3 處見證
𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT οἱ
Peshitta ܗܢܘܢ
Vulgate Qui

Greek uses the substantival article οἱ ('those who') governing the following participle, while the Peshitta employs the independent demonstrative pronoun ܗܢܘܢ and the Vulgate the relative pronoun Qui; all three express the same anaphoric subject through differing syntactic strategies.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
omission Two witnesses
Greek NT δὲ
Peshitta ܕܝܢ

The Greek postpositive δέ and the Syriac ܕܝܢ (itself a Greek loan-particle) mark the transition, but the Vulgate omits any adversative/connective particle here, beginning the clause directly with Qui.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ἀκούσαντες
Peshitta ܟܕ ܫܡܥܘ
Vulgate audientes

Greek and Latin render the aorist participle ἀκούσαντες / audientes as a single circumstantial participle, whereas the Peshitta unpacks it into a temporal clause ܟܕ ܫܡܥܘ ('when they heard'), a characteristic Syriac periphrasis for Greek participles.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
grammar All three attest
Greek NT ἐχάρησαν
Peshitta ܚܕܝܘ
Vulgate gavisi sunt

Greek ἐχάρησαν and Syriac ܚܕܝܘ are simple finite verbs, while the Vulgate uses the analytic perfect-deponent periphrasis gavisi sunt; the difference is purely morphosyntactic, conveying the same notion of rejoicing.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT δοῦναι·
Peshitta ܕܢܬܠܘܢ
Vulgate daturos Et

Greek expresses the promise with a bare aorist infinitive δοῦναι and Syriac with the finite subjunctive clause ܕܢܬܠܘܢ ('that they would give'), whereas the Vulgate uses the future periphrastic accusative-and-future-participle construction se daturos, a Latinate rendering of indirect discourse.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
grammar All three attest
Greek NT ἐζήτει
Peshitta ܘܒܥܐ ܗܘܐ
Vulgate quomodo

Greek imperfect ἐζήτει and Latin imperfect quærebat express durative action; the Peshitta renders this with the periphrastic past ܒܥܐ ܗܘܐ (perfect of 'seek' + enclitic ܗܘܐ), the standard Syriac equivalent of the Greek imperfect.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
substitution All three attest
Greek NT εὐκαίρως
Peshitta ܦܠܥܐ
Vulgate traderet

Greek εὐκαίρως ('opportunely, at a fitting time') is matched by Latin opportune, but the Peshitta reads ܦܠܥܐ here — an anomalous form (root p-l-e); a faithful adverbial 'conveniently' is expected, and the transmitted word likely reflects a scribal corruption of ܦܐܝܐ/ܒܙܒܢܐ or a rare lexeme, warranting collation against other Peshitta witnesses.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
punctuation Vulgate only
Vulgate et

The Clementine Vulgate inserts a colon after gavisi sunt to mark the syntactic boundary before et promiserunt; neither the Greek nor the Syriac transmits a corresponding punctuation marker at this point in these editions.