Mark 15 : 20

Greek coordinates the temporal clause with καὶ ὅτε ('and when'); the Peshitta fuses conjunction and temporal particle into a single proclitic form ܘܟܕ; the Vulgate renders the temporal relation with the subordinator postquam ('after'), so the conjunction Et and the temporal marker are split across two tokens.

Greek uses the dative αὐτῷ governed by ἐμπαίζω; the Peshitta supplies the prepositional ܒܗ ('at/on him'); the Vulgate matches with the dative ei — all express the indirect object of mockery, the Syriac being the most explicit prepositional construction.

Greek marks the garment with the feminine article plus noun τὴν πορφύραν; the Peshitta uses the loanword ܐܪܓܘܢܐ (from Greek/Latin purpura-type stock) without article; the Vulgate gives the bare ablative-of-separation purpura. Article-bearing Greek versus anarthrous Syriac/Latin is a routine stylistic difference.

The Greek and Vulgate coordinate the next clause with a standalone conjunction (καὶ / et), whereas the Peshitta prefixes the conjunction directly onto the verb in ܘܐܠܒܫܘܗܝ; the conjunction is thus grouped here with the verb that follows in the Syriac column.

Greek and Latin express the accusative object with a separate pronoun (αὐτὸν / eum); the Peshitta encloses the object pronominal suffix within the verb ܐܠܒܫܘܗܝ ('they clothed-him'), a typical Syriac synthetic construction collapsing verb and object.

Greek has article + noun + possessive genitive (τὰ ἱμάτια αὐτοῦ, 'his garments'); the Vulgate renders the instrumental/ablative vestimentis suis; the Peshitta uses the single inflected form ܡܐܢܘܗܝ with possessive suffix ('his garments'), again compressing the possessive into the noun without separate pronoun or article.

Greek and Latin again use a discrete conjunction (καὶ / et) introducing the final clause, while the Peshitta affixes the conjunction to the verb in ܘܐܦܩܘܗܝ; the proclitic conjunction is grouped with the verb in the Syriac column.

Greek uses the historic present ἐξάγουσιν ('they lead out'), vividly retained as a present in the Vulgate's educunt; the Peshitta employs a perfect form ܐܦܩܘܗܝ ('they led him out'), normalising the tense to a simple past, a common Syriac treatment of the Markan historic present.

Greek and Latin carry a separate accusative pronoun (αὐτὸν / illum); the Peshitta incorporates the object suffix into the verb ܐܦܩܘܗܝ, consistent with its synthetic verb-plus-object pattern.

Greek uses the aorist subjunctive σταυρώσωσιν within a ἵνα purpose clause; the Vulgate matches with the imperfect subjunctive crucifigerent; the Peshitta combines purpose particle, imperfect verb, and object suffix into the single form ܕܢܙܩܦܘܢܝܗܝ ('that they might crucify him'), so the object pronoun has no independent Syriac token.

Greek and Latin render the final object as the discrete pronoun αὐτόν / eum, whereas in the Peshitta the object is the suffix -ܝܗܝ embedded in ܕܢܙܩܦܘܢܝܗܝ; the verdict reflects this construction-level difference rather than any semantic divergence.