Greek ἔρχονται and Latin veniunt are independent verbs ('they come'), whereas the Peshitta fuses conjunction and verb into ܘܐܬܘ ('and they came'); the Syriac perfect contrasts with the Greek/Latin present, a routine tense-levelling in narrative.
EN He came to the synagogue ruler’s house, and he saw an uproar, weeping, and great wailing.
ES Y vino á casa del príncipe de la sinagoga, y vió el alboroto, los que lloraban y gemían mucho.
ZH-HANS 他们来到管会堂的家里;耶稣看见那里乱嚷,并有人大大地哭泣哀号,
ZH-HANT 他們來到管會堂的家裏;耶穌看見那裏亂嚷,並有人大大地哭泣哀號,
Greek ἔρχονται and Latin veniunt are independent verbs ('they come'), whereas the Peshitta fuses conjunction and verb into ܘܐܬܘ ('and they came'); the Syriac perfect contrasts with the Greek/Latin present, a routine tense-levelling in narrative.
Greek has article plus noun (τὸν οἶκον) and Latin a bare accusative (domum), while Syriac ܠܒܝܬܐ prefixes the preposition ܠ directly to the noun, encoding goal-of-motion morphologically rather than with a separate particle as in εἰς/in.
Greek and Latin render the title with a single compound noun (ἀρχισυναγώγου / archisynagogi, 'synagogue-ruler'); the Peshitta unpacks it into the demonstrative ܕܗܘ plus the analytic phrase ܪܒ ܟܢܘܫܬܐ ('that chief of the assembly'), a typical Syriac periphrasis for the Greek compound.
Greek θόρυβον and Latin tumultum are abstract nouns ('a commotion/uproar'); the Peshitta renders with a verbal clause ܕܪܗܝܒܝܢ ('that they were in tumult/agitated'), shifting from nominal to participial syntax while preserving the sense of disorder.
Greek κλαίοντας and Latin flentes are accusative participles dependent on the verb of perception; Syriac ܘܒܟܝܢ is a finite plural participle coordinated by waw, harmonising the construction with the surrounding clause-string rather than subordinating it.
Greek ἀλαλάζοντας and Latin ejulantes denote loud wailing/ululation; the Peshitta ܘܡܝܠܠܝܢ (root m-l-l) connotes lamenting cries, a near-equivalent rendering that captures the ritual mourning sound without exact lexical correspondence.
Greek πολλά ('much/greatly') is matched by Latin multum but has no corresponding adverbial element in the Peshitta, which leaves the intensity of the wailing unqualified; this is a minor omission of an adverbial modifier.