Greek ἀπέστειλεν and Latin misit are discrete finite verbs, whereas the Peshitta fuses verb and pronominal object into the single inflected form ܘܫܕܪܗ ('and-he-sent-him'), a typical Syriac synthetic construction encoding the 3ms object suffix.
EN He sent him away to his house, saying, “Don’t enter into the village, nor tell anyone in the village.”
ES Y envióle á su casa, diciendo: No entres en la aldea, ni lo digas á nadie en la aldea.
ZH-HANS 耶稣打发他回家,说:「连这村子你也不要进去。」
ZH-HANT 耶穌打發他回家,說:「連這村子你也不要進去。」
Greek ἀπέστειλεν and Latin misit are discrete finite verbs, whereas the Peshitta fuses verb and pronominal object into the single inflected form ܘܫܕܪܗ ('and-he-sent-him'), a typical Syriac synthetic construction encoding the 3ms object suffix.
Greek εἰς τὸν οἶκον αὐτοῦ and Latin in domum suam render the destination with preposition, article/noun, and possessive; the Peshitta again synthesises the whole phrase into ܠܒܝܬܗ ('to-his-house'), with the lamadh preposition and pronominal suffix bound to the noun.
Greek uses the present participle λέγων ('saying'), matched by the Latin participle dicens, while the Peshitta employs a coordinated finite verb ܘܐܡܪ ('and he said'), a paratactic rendering idiomatic to Syriac narrative. The Vulgate's colon (idx 7) marks the onset of direct speech.
The Vulgate inserts an entire command absent from the Greek and Syriac witnesses: Vade in domum tuam ('Go into your house'), followed by a colon. This expansion, attested in part of the Latin tradition, doubles the dismissal motif and has no counterpart in NA28 or the Peshitta here.
Greek negates with the single compound adverb μηδέ ('not even'); the Peshitta expresses the same emphatic negation analytically with ܐܦ ܠܐ ('also not'), and the Vulgate reconfigures the clause with et si ('and if'), shifting from a flat prohibition to a conditional construction.
Greek εἰς τὴν κώμην and Latin in vicum render 'into the village' with preposition plus article/noun; the Peshitta uses the determined form ܠܩܪܝܬܐ with prefixed lamadh, the article being inherent in the emphatic state.
Greek aorist subjunctive εἰσέλθῃς functions prohibitively, matched by the Peshitta jussive imperfect ܬܥܘܠ; the Latin perfect subjunctive introieris ('if you shall have entered') reflects the conditional reframing introduced by si rather than a prohibition.
Greek μηδέ ('nor') continues the double prohibition; the Peshitta renders this with ܘܠܐ ('and not'). The Latin lacks a discrete coordinating negative here, the et having been displaced into the conditional structure.
Greek aorist subjunctive εἴπῃς ('lest you tell') and Peshitta ܬܐܡܪ are jussive prohibitions, while the Latin perfect subjunctive dixeris coheres with the conditional/result framing established by si...introieris.
Greek indefinite τινί ('to anyone') with dative is rendered by the Peshitta ܠܐܢܫ ('to a man/anyone'), using the noun for 'person' as an indefinite; the Latin contracts the negative and indirect object into the single dative nemini ('to no one').
Greek ἐν τῇ κώμῃ ('in the village'), with prepositional phrase and final paragraph marker, is matched by the Peshitta ܒܩܪܝܬܐ (prefixed beth plus emphatic noun). The Vulgate omits any repetition of 'in the village' here, having ended the clause at nemini dixeris.