Mark 3 : 26

The Peshitta inserts the independent pronoun ܗܘ ('he') as subject, a common Semitic clarifying device where Greek uses only the article ὁ and Latin omits both. This represents stylistic preference rather than semantic divergence.

Greek employs aorist ἀνέστη with prepositional phrase ἐφ᾽ ἑαυτόν; Vulgate uses perfect consurrexerit with in semetipsum; Peshitta uses perfect ܩܡ ܥܠ ܢܦܫܗ. All three express 'risen against himself' with equivalent semantics but differing aspectual nuances (Greek aorist vs. Latin/Syriac perfect).

Greek coordinates with καὶ ἐμερίσθη (aorist passive indicative); Vulgate restructures as dispertitus est (perfect passive with auxiliary), inserting et to maintain coordination; Peshitta uses simple ܘܐܬܦܠܓ (ethpeel perfect). The Vulgate's participial construction reflects Latin stylistic preference for subordination over Greek parataxis.

Greek uses accusative object τέλος with verb ἔχει ('has an end'); Vulgate mirrors this with finem habet; Peshitta employs possessive construction ܚܪܬܗ ܗܝ (literally 'his end it-is'), using the copular pronoun ܗܝ for emphasis. This represents a characteristic Syriac nominal-sentence structure versus Greek/Latin verbal predication.