Polyglot Concordance / Mk · Debates in the Temple
New Testament · Debates in the Temple · Mark

Mark 12 : 26

EN But about the dead, that they are raised; haven’t you read in the book of Moses, about the Bush, how God spoke to him, saying, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’?

ES Y de que los muertos hayan de resucitar, ¿no habéis leído en el libro de Moisés cómo le habló Dios en la zarza, diciendo: Yo soy el Dios de Abraham, y el Dios de Isaac, y el Dios de Jacob?

ZH-HANS 论到死人复活,你们没有念过摩西的书荆棘篇上所载的吗? 神对摩西说:『我是亚伯拉罕的 神,以撒的 神,雅各的 神。』

ZH-HANT 論到死人復活,你們沒有念過摩西的書荊棘篇上所載的嗎?上帝對摩西說:『我是亞伯拉罕的上帝,以撒的上帝,雅各的上帝。』

Mark 12:25
Mark :
Mark 12:27

批判性批註

9 處異文 · 3 處見證
𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT δὲ
Peshitta ܕܝܢ
Vulgate autem

The postpositive Greek δέ and Latin autem stand in second position, while Syriac ܕܝܢ (a loan-particle from Greek δέ) likewise occupies second slot after ܡܝܬܐ; all three agree in sense ('but/now') though Syriac places it after the noun rather than after the preposition.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ὅτι ἐγείρονται
Peshitta ܕܩܝܡܝܢ
Vulgate quod resurgant

Greek uses a ὅτι-clause with present passive ἐγείρονται and Latin a quod-clause with subjunctive resurgant ('that they rise'); Syriac compresses to a single participial relative ܕܩܝܡܝܢ ('who rise/stand'), a construction-level difference yielding the same propositional content.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ἐν τῇ βίβλῳ
Peshitta ܒܟܬܒܐ
Vulgate in libro

Greek ἐν τῇ βίβλῳ and Latin in libro render the locative with preposition plus article, whereas Syriac ܒܟܬܒܐ fuses the preposition ܒ with the noun in a single bound form, the article being inherent; a routine morphological compression.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ἐπὶ τοῦ βάτου
Peshitta ܡܢ ܣܢܝܐ
Vulgate super rubum

Greek ἐπὶ τοῦ βάτου ('at the bush') uses ἐπί + genitive, Latin super rubum uses super + accusative, and Syriac ܡܢ ܣܢܝܐ employs ܡܢ ('from/at the bush'); the prepositional choice differs across all three but each idiomatically denotes the locus of the theophany at the burning bush.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
omission Two witnesses
Greek NT λέγων·
Vulgate inquiens Ego

Greek λέγων and Latin inquiens (with colon) supply an explicit participle of speech introducing the quotation; the Peshitta omits any such redundant verbum dicendi, passing directly from ܐܠܗܐ to the first-person quotation, a frequent Syriac stylistic economy.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ἐγὼ
Peshitta ܐܢܐ ܐܢܐ
Vulgate sum Deus

Greek ἐγώ stands as a bare nominative pronoun ('I [am]'); Latin makes the copula explicit with Ego sum; Syriac doubles the pronoun ܐܢܐ ܐܢܐ, the second functioning as the enclitic copula in the characteristic Syriac nominal-sentence construction ('I am').

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ὁ θεὸς Ἀβραὰμ
Peshitta ܐܠܗܗ ܕܐܒܪܗܡ
Vulgate Abraham et

Greek ὁ θεὸς Ἀβραάμ and Latin Deus Abraham use article/noun plus bare genitive name, while Syriac ܐܠܗܗ ܕܐܒܪܗܡ binds a 3ms possessive suffix to ܐܠܗ ('his God, namely of Abraham') and prefixes the genitive marker ܕ, a syntactically distinct but semantically equivalent possessive construction.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ὁ θεὸς Ἰσαὰκ
Peshitta ܕܐܝܣܚܩ
Vulgate Isaac et

As in the Abraham clause, Syriac collapses 'the God of Isaac' into a single suffixed form ܘܐܠܗܗ ܕܐܝܣܚܩ with conjunction prefixed, whereas Greek and Latin spell out article-plus-noun plus genitive name; a recurring construction-level difference.

𝔊 grk ℙ syr 𝔙 vul
construction All three attest
Greek NT ὁ θεὸς Ἰακώβ;
Peshitta ܕܝܥܩܘܒ
Vulgate Jacob

The final clause repeats the same pattern: Syriac ܘܐܠܗܗ ܕܝܥܩܘܒ uses a suffixed possessive against the analytic Greek and Latin phrasing; the Greek interrogative punctuation (Ἰακώβ;) and Latin '?' mark the whole as a rhetorical question, a feature unmarked in the Peshitta script here.