Mark 14 : 24

Greek and Latin treat the verb of speaking as a discrete finite verb (εἶπεν / ait) preceded by the conjunction; the Peshitta fuses the conjunction ܘ with the verb ܐܡܪ into a single graphic word (ܘܐܡܪ), a normal feature of Syriac orthography where the waw-conjunctive is prefixed.

Greek marks the boundary of direct speech with a raised dot enclitic to αὐτοῖς·, whereas the Vulgate isolates the colon as a separate token after illis; the Peshitta ܠܗܘܢ carries no punctuation. The divergence is purely scribal/editorial, not semantic.

Greek expresses 'my blood' analytically with article + noun + genitive pronoun (τὸ αἷμά μου), and Latin with sanguis meus; the Peshitta employs a suffixed pronominal form ܕܡܝ ('my-blood'), the standard Syriac means of encoding pronominal possession synthetically.

Greek frames the appositional phrase with a leading neuter article τὸ governing the genitive τῆς καινῆς διαθήκης ('which [is] of the new covenant'); Latin renders it as a simple genitive of apposition (novi testamenti). The Peshitta ܕܕܝܬܩܐ ܚܕܬܐ uses a Greek loanword (διαθήκη > ܕܝܬܩܐ) with the relative/genitive particle ܕ, semantically equivalent though lexically borrowed.

Greek uses an articular present passive participle τὸ ἐκχυννόμενον ('which is being poured out'); Latin recasts this as a relative clause with a future verb (qui … effundetur), and the Peshitta as the present participle ܡܬܐܫܕ. Notably the Latin places the verb at the clause's end whereas Greek and Syriac retain it before or among the prepositional phrase, a difference of sequence and tense aspect.

Greek and Latin use a free-standing preposition (ὑπὲρ / pro) governing the object; the Peshitta prefixes the preposition ܚܠܦ with the relative particle ܕ as ܕܚܠܦ, integrating it syntactically with the participial clause in typical Syriac fashion.