Mark 14 : 36

Greek ἔλεγεν is imperfect ('he was saying', durative), whereas the Vulgate dixit is perfect/aorist and the Peshitta ܘܐܡܪ is a simple perfect; the Syriac fuses the conjunction and verb into a single prefixed form, while the Vulgate adds a colon to introduce direct speech.

Greek substantival neuter plural πάντα and Latin omnia express 'all things' with a single word; Syriac uses the analytic pairing ܟܠ ܡܕܡ ('every thing'), a routine idiomatic expansion to render the universal.

Greek δυνατά (neuter plural adjective with elided copula) and Syriac ܡܫܟܚ ('is able/possible') express possibility; the Vulgate supplies the explicit copula sunt alongside possibilia, making the predication overt where Greek leaves the verb 'to be' understood.

All three attest the second-person referent ('to You'), but the Peshitta employs the independent pronoun ܐܢܬ rather than a dative form; word order also differs, the Vulgate placing tibi before the predicate adjective whereas Greek σοι follows it.

Greek ἀπ᾽ ἐμοῦ and Latin a me use a preposition plus pronoun ('from me'); Syriac compresses this into the single suffixed form ܡܢܝ ('from-me'), and the Peshitta places this phrase earlier in the clause, before the noun 'cup', yielding a word-order difference.

Greek and Latin use the interrogative/relative construction 'what I will' (τί ἐγὼ θέλω / quod ego volo) with an explicit verb of willing; the Peshitta nominalises the idea as ܨܒܝܢܝ ('my will') reinforced by the emphatic possessive ܕܝܠܝ, replacing the verbal clause with a noun phrase — a construction difference, not a semantic one.

Greek τί σύ and Latin quod tu repeat the interrogative/relative plus pronoun ('what you [will]') with the verb elided; the Peshitta again uses the single emphatic possessive ܕܝܠܟ ('that which is yours'), maintaining its nominal parallelism between the two wills.

The Vulgate inserts a second colon to mark the transition into the petition (transfer calicem hunc...), a punctuation feature with no counterpart token in the Greek or Syriac, which mark clause boundaries lexically rather than orthographically.

A further Vulgate colon separates the petition from the adversative clause; this editorial punctuation of the Clementine edition has no equivalent in the unpunctuated transmission underlying the Greek and Syriac witnesses.