EN He said to her, “For this saying, go your way. The demon has gone out of your daughter.”
ES Entonces le dice: Por esta palabra, ve; el demonio ha salido de tu hija.
ZH-HANS 耶稣对她说：「因这句话，你回去吧；鬼已经离开你的女儿了。」
ZH-HANT 耶穌對她說：「因這句話，你回去吧；鬼已經離開你的女兒了。」
The Peshitta makes the implicit subject explicit by inserting ܝܫܘܥ ('Jesus'), whereas both the Greek and Vulgate leave the subject of the verb unexpressed and recoverable only from context. This is a typical Syriac clarifying expansion.
The Vulgate inserts a colon after illi marking the boundary of direct speech; the Greek uses a high point (·) after αὐτῇ for the same purpose, while the Peshitta supplies no punctuation token. A versional difference in editorial pointing rather than text.
Greek τοῦτον τὸν (masculine, agreeing with λόγον) employs the demonstrative with article; the Vulgate hunc matches in masculine gender, while Syriac ܗܕܐ is feminine, agreeing with the feminine noun ܡܠܬܐ ('word'). The gender shift simply reflects the grammatical gender of the respective nouns for 'word'.
All three witnesses attest the imperative 'go' (ὕπαγε / ܙܠܝ / vade), but the Peshitta positions it immediately after the verb of speaking and before the causal clause (ܙܠܝ ... ܡܛܠ), whereas Greek and Latin place it after the causal phrase ('because of this word, go'). The reordering is stylistic and does not alter sense.
Greek ἐξελήλυθεν is a perfect ('has gone forth'), stressing the completed and abiding result, and the Vulgate matches with the perfect exiit; Syriac ܢܦܩ is a simple perfect of 'go out' without the durative nuance of the Greek perfect. The aspectual force differs slightly though the basic temporal sense agrees.
The Peshitta adds the dative ܠܗ ('from her' / ethical dative) after the verb 'has gone out', an idiomatic Syriac construction with no counterpart in the Greek or Vulgate. It reinforces that the departure concerns the daughter.
All three render 'out of your daughter' (ἐκ τῆς θυγατρός σου / ܡܢ ܒܪܬܟܝ / a filia tua), but Greek and Latin place this prepositional phrase before the subject 'the demon', whereas the Peshitta places the demon (ܫܐܕܐ) before the phrase ('the demon has gone out of your daughter'). The difference is one of clause order, not lexical content.